Search for: "Kerr v. Kerr"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 2,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm
heard 4 and 5 February 2020 (Etherton MR, David Richards and Coulson LJJ) Various Claimants v MGN, heard, 28 to 31 January 2020 (Mann J) Dawson-Damer & Ors v Taylor Wessing LLP & Ors, heard 29 and 30 January 2020 (Floyd, Newey and Arnold LJJ) W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants, heard 6 and 7 November 2019 (Lady Hale and Lords Reed, Kerr, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones) Please let us know if there are other reserved judgments which… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am
Lord Irvine singled out for praise Lord Kerr’s dissenting judgment in that case, in which he said at paragraph 130 it would be particularly unsatisfactory, I believe, if, because of an Ullah-type reticence, we should feel constrained not to reach a decision on the arguments advanced by the respondents to these references just because those very arguments are likely to be ventilated on behalf of the applicant in ECtHR inAbdurahman v United Kingdom application no… [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 6:19 pm
See Kerr, supra, at 1210-12. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:11 pm
Washington-Carty v Fisher, heard 14 July 2017 (HHJ Moloney QC) David v Hosany, heard 20, 21 and 24 July 2017 (HHJ Moloney QC) Bukovsky v CPS, heard 5 October 2017 (Gross, Si [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am
Furthermore, in a 2011 judgment on an immigration case from the Supreme Court, ZH (Tanzania) v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am
Furthermore, in a 2011 judgment on an immigration case from the Supreme Court, ZH (Tanzania) v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 10:52 am
Filburn and Katzenbach v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am
Kerr-McGee Corp., 464 U.S. 238 (1984) Geier v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 5:53 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 4:45 am
Orin Kerr wants to make your day just a little bit worse. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm
Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Dyson and Brown also agreed that the inquest into the McCaughey and Grew deaths was required by the HRA, interpreted in the light of Silih, to be Article 2 compliant, the latter pointing out ([102]) that “[t]here are, we were told, 16 existing “legacy inquests” (involving 26 deaths) currently outstanding on the coroner’s books, a further six incidents (involving eight pre-2000 deaths) referred by the Attorney General to the Coroner for… [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 3:57 am
See United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 3:14 pm
For instance, he might set a criminal free for a reason which has nothing to do with the reliability of the evidence or the justice of the case.Orin Kerr at VC has this post on United States v. [read post]
6 May 2007, 7:30 pm
Professor Kerr. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 5:53 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 7:35 am
See, Orrin Kerr. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:52 am
A more usual decision from the 6th is US v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:28 am
Following the Supreme Court’s decision in R (on the application of G) v The Governors of School X probably not if you’re a teacher in a state school. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:06 am
Pickar, 616 F.3d 821, 827 (8th Cir. 2010) (quoting United States v. [read post]
