Search for: "King v. United States" Results 1881 - 1900 of 3,017
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2024, 4:17 am by admin
” An estimated 10.5 million unauthorized immigrants live in the United States, according to 2023 Pew Research data. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:11 am by Susan Hennessey
It prohibits any “Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under [the United States]” from accepting “any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Fault Lines, Andrew King discusses Kokesh v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 1:38 pm
Kozinksi was channeling Justice Brandeis’s words dissenting in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
TCE is not so much about big corporations stealing stuff from indigenous groups (even the Lion King song was from a specific composer who himself used traditional rhythms etc.) as about generations of sketchy anthropological practices. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:40 am by Dan Gauss
Steve King (R-IA), the bill does a couple of things: •    It makes English the official language of the United States. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:26 pm by Jackie McDermott
“When somebody’s the president of the United States, the authority is total,” Trump said. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:52 pm by Ben Berwick, Rachel Homer
” Instead, the Framers drafted a Constitution that required the Senate’s “Advice and Consent” for the appointment of “Officers of the United States. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 6:09 am by Joy Waltemath
” He also allegedly told the African-American plaintiff that “[t]hese wetback mother f**kers come to [the] United States and . . . should be happy that they have a mother F’ing job,” and called a plaintiff who was born in the Ukraine a “f**king Russian” and “white trash. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:34 am by Doyle Hodges
§ 332 states, “Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may … use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion” (emphasis added). [read post]