Search for: "Lake v State"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 2,975
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2010, 10:47 pm
See "The New Politics of Judicial Elections in the Great Lakes States, 2000–2008" by Justice at Stake. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:55 pm
On April 25, the Supreme Court will hear arguments on Arizona v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 9:00 pm
” His team got their fees and expenses reimbursed by the State of Idaho —about $250,000 — when the Salt Lake City judge ruled against the state. [read post]
2 May 2017, 9:42 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 10:48 am
State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am
First, a lead agency can reasonably conclude that a project which exceeds state energy efficiency standards has a less than significant impact. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:29 pm
By: Craig V. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:22 am
ACLU of Kentucky and Van Orden v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm
Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S. 159 (2001) and Rapanos v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 7:00 am
Vanvoras’ home and the Lake Charles Country Club. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 8:33 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 11:19 am
State Department. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 10:40 am
State of Indiana Chad Bryant v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm
Sierra Club, et al. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:56 am
At the Notice and Comment blog, David Feder discusses Esquivel-Quintana v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
District Courts (District of Utah), State District Court (Utah) and Utah Dispute Resolution. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 5:54 am
Inn of Lake City, Inc., 693 So. 2d 1126, 1130–32 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Sotomayor v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 8:18 am
For this proposition, the court relied upon Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 7:20 am
The following is a Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide for the State of Michigan. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Both federal and state environmental review were necessitated for the project, however the appellate court only reviewed the relevant state law issues. [read post]
