Search for: "Land v. United States"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 6,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2011, 6:34 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 6:21 am
In Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 11:21 am
The trend appears largely, if not entirely, in cases against the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am
The legal opinion would become popularly known as The Boldt Decision.The actual title of the case is United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:41 am
Citing with approval the recent judgment of the International Court of Justice (“ICJ”) in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:55 am
Yesterday the Court announced that it had granted review in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 9:40 pm
" United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am
There is still more coverage of and commentary on United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 2:38 am
United States (Federal Fiduciary Duty)Northern Natural Gas Company v. 80 Acres of Land in Thurston County (Rights-of-Way)Wilhite v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 8:17 pm
The Court of Appeals stated that in the present case, this did not happen. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:04 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 4:19 am
Hawks: Why Federal Courts Have the Power to Recognize and Enforce Tribal Court Judgments Against Nonmembers “Because of the Federal Government’s Unique Relationship with Indian Tribes” – Heath Albert PDF The Disproportionate Effect on Native American Women of Extending the Federal Involuntary Manslaughter Act to Include a Woman’s Conduct Against Her Child in Utero: United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 7:38 am
Osofsky, The intersection of scale, science, and law in Massachusetts v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 11:33 am
'" It said "the literal interpretation of the concept of public use which the petitioners urge us to apply was abandoned long before the United States Supreme Court concluded [in Kelo v City of New London (545 US 469 [2005])] that the use of eminent domain to carry out an economic development plan does not violate the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 4:40 pm
The US Supreme Court's opinion in Oliphant v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm
” Bowen physically assaulted Kelly and attempted to throw her over the top railing of the second story landing of their residence. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 7:10 am
Supreme Court's controversial 2005 decision in Kelo v New London (545 US 469) greatly expanded the government's power of eminent domain by holding that the government could transfer land from one private owner to another to further economic development. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 2:44 am
Moreover, state interests in land use regulation may also be implicated in that case. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 4:59 pm
Moreover, state interests in land use regulation may also be implicated in that case. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 7:16 am
United States, 136 Fed. [read post]
