Search for: "MATTER OF INQUIRY INTO M M" Results 1881 - 1900 of 2,738
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2012, 12:47 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
I’m not a statistics expert, of course, but to my untrained eye this just doesn’t seem to be a valid sample size from which one could draw any useful conclusions whatsoever. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:57 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
But, it won’t matter how modern the justice system is, if people can’t access it. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 11:30 am by Eugene Volokh
To quote the 2nd Circuit, There are significant differences between, on the one hand, threatened disclosures of such matters as consumer complaints and nonpayment of dues, as to which the threatener has a plausible claim of right, and, on the other hand, threatened disclosures of such matters as sexual indiscretions that have no nexus with any plausible claim of right. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 6:17 pm by Alan Rozenshtein
” In a footnote, Justice Alito rejected a proposal to resolve the standing inquiry by having the government disclose in camera whether it is targeting the plaintiffs’ foreign contacts. [read post]
7 May 2008, 10:42 pm
  Many of the same entities had been subject to similar orders in 2003 when the Commissioner conducted an inquiry into a bottling agreement among the brewers, and in 2006, when the Commissioner was reviewing the sale of another Canadian brewery, Sleeman's. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 4:21 am by Terry Hart
The prescriptive essay argued that the “heart” of the fair use inquiry was the first factor, the purpose and character of the use, and that the answer to the inquiry lied in determining whether the challenged use is “transformative. [read post]
7 May 2008, 3:42 pm
  Many of the same entities had been subject to similar orders in 2003 when the Commissioner conducted an inquiry into a bottling agreement among the brewers, and in 2006, when the Commissioner was reviewing the sale of another Canadian brewery, Sleeman's. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 6:09 pm
"Two American citizens with no personal or financial problems, no serious health problems, living the happiest time of their lives, both vanished without a trace or witness," he later told an inquiry. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 3:46 pm
Klingel pleaded not guilty to all of the charges.The matter proceeded to a jury trial. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:22 pm by H. Scott Leviant
It is a bit belated, but I'm getting some write-ups of the big cases up for your reading pleasure (or agony). [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 9:54 am by Kenneth Anderson
 I’m sure it will generate a lot of interest and a lot of pushback in several directions. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by The Legal Blog
A three-Judge Bench of this court in M/s Northern India Caterers (India) Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:50 pm by Michael O'Hear
Coupled with her opinion in Bryant, which I’m about to get to, it seems safe to say that Sotomayor has mixed—perhaps not entirely coherent—feelings about Crawford, and that her addition to the Court may conceivably prove decisive in slowing or halting the so-called Crawford revolution. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 Schleicher’s theories implicate matters of high Constitutional law, unresolved details of municipal bankruptcy, and pretty much the full sweep of local government law, and he gamely takes them all on. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Such safe space protects “[d]iversity of opinion about matters that matter a lot,” even when “people … regard one another’s views as repulsive, grave moral errors,” allowing us to “live peacefully together in mutual contempt” (page 145).I think I agree with all of his specific prescriptions for religious exemptions, just as a matter of practical common-sense. [read post]