Search for: "Matter of Estate of Gaines" Results 1881 - 1900 of 2,216
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2010, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Further, contrary to the petitioners' contention, the law does not limit the application of a lack of marketability discount to the goodwill of a corporation in all instances (see Matter of Brooklyn Home Dialysis Training Ctr., 293 AD2d 747; Hall v King, 265 AD2d 244, 245; Lehman v Piontkowski, 203 AD2d 257, 259; Matter of Raskin v Walter Karl, Inc., 129 AD2d 642, 644; Matter of Joy Wholesale Sundries, 125 AD2d 310; Matter of Fleischer, 107 AD2d 97;… [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 6:38 am by Kelly
Federal Estate Tax Makes News Again Increase Gas Tax? [read post]
30 May 2010, 8:41 am by Patti Spencer
Estate planning aims at the transfer of wealth from one generation to another in a way which minimizes taxes and maximizes economic gain. [read post]
29 May 2010, 5:17 am by Mandelman
  And that feeling, no matter how we try to ignore it, suppress it, hope it away… grows stronger as the months pass by. [read post]
27 May 2010, 11:20 am by Adrian Lurssen
What did you gain as a prosecutor there during those days? [read post]
27 May 2010, 5:06 am by Rich Vetstein
It would not matter to me if you were closing in one week or 60 days out. [read post]
25 May 2010, 9:47 am by Jordan Furlong
Many lawyers are already in this boat — much of the residential real estate bar, for instance. [read post]
25 May 2010, 5:30 am
 After Wal-Mart timely removed the action to the District Court, the court, sua sponte reviewed the subject-matter jurisdiction. [read post]
25 May 2010, 3:00 am by LindaMBeale
  That is true of anyone who pays tax (or any other expense, for that matter). [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:40 pm by Kevin Funnell
"Some banks are too big to fail while others are too small to matter. [read post]
19 May 2010, 8:00 am by Larry Ribstein
  Why should it matter that they happen to be investing through a partnership, essentially borrowing from the investors and paying them interest in the form of the substantial share of the gains the investors get to keep? [read post]
16 May 2010, 4:07 pm by Mandelman
No financial reforms needed to be passed, no second economic stimulus bill… obviously we didn’t need tax cuts… the banks didn’t need to start lending again, foreclosures don’t seem to matter a lick, in fact our real estate markets are on their way up, as I’ve heard tell. [read post]
12 May 2010, 3:00 am by LindaMBeale
  It doesn't cause family farms to be lost, no matter how many times the wealthy families' coalition spokespersons claim that it does. [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The claim also included the allegation that consumers were induced to purchase the Mint’s dolls and plates based on a mistaken belief that they were endorsed by, associated with, or affiliated with Diana, her estate, and/or the Fund. [read post]
Does it violate the 5th and 14th Amendments for Wisconsin—like some jurisdictions, but in conflict with others and with this Court’s repeated insistence that the appropriate question in an eminent domain proceeding is "what has the owner lost, not what has the taker gained"—to apply its "undivided fee rule" in such circumstances? [read post]
4 May 2010, 6:09 am by admin
” I can quote it from memory because definitions matter in real estate transactions, which are governed by written organizational and financing documents. [read post]