Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 119,862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2023, 5:56 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
In addition, in certain instances, the President of the United States may render a determination inoperable for policy reasons. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:36 pm
On December 2, 2015, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 12:25 am
The United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Amalfitano v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am
STATE V. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:29 pm
See State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 1:59 pm
Noah's Ark Church, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 6:59 am
In Lingle v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:33 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:28 pm
The recent United States Supreme Court ruling in Padilla v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:21 am
Once again the RIAA has commenced a "John Doe" case targeting North Carolina State University students, this one entitled Arista v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:26 am
52/05 P Sweden and Turco v Council [2008] ECR I? [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
No superiority due to multiple state laws.Dimich v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 1:55 am
Where, however, there is an apparent inconsistency in the verdicts at a nonjury trial, but where the trial judge on the record satisfactorily explains the apparent inconsistency, the guilty verdict may stand. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:40 am
In Dion v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 12:44 am
It does not require an intent beyond that just stated. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 5:38 am
"In this case, however, the Appellant did not seek to prove that he would not have been convicted of some degree of homicide - he only sought to disprove the State's theory of capital murder. [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:59 pm
On 13 May 2010 Mr Justice Eady struck out the libel claim in Kaschke v Osler ([2010] EWHC 1075, see our post here). [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 6:23 am
State v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 4:00 am
It is posted on the Internet at http://www.jcope.ny.gov/advice/ethc/98-12.htmIn Pagan v Commissioner of Labor, 53 AD3d 964, the Appellate Division addressed the disqualification of an applicant for unemployment insurance benefits following his termination for accepting a designation to run as a candidate for the State Assembly, ruling that his employment was terminated due to misconduct. [read post]
