Search for: "PARTY CITY HOLDINGS, INC." Results 1881 - 1900 of 2,327
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2010, 3:58 am
The Supreme Court held in a 5-4 decision that under the Federal Arbitration Act, where parties to an arbitration agreement include a provision that delegates to the arbitrator the gateway question of enforceability of the agreement, if a party specifically challenges the enforceability of the particular agreement, a district court will consider the challenge, but if a party challenges the enforceability of the agreement as a whole, the arbitrator will consider the… [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm by Steven M. Taber
EPA alleges that Oxarc, Inc. failed to update their Risk Management Program at least every five years. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 4:16 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 US 579 which, in federal courts, displaced the Frye general acceptance standard based upon the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 10:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Many advantages to that for attorneys and parties. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:39 am by Don Cruse
Here, we apply the same principle to hold that the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to stay the litigation related to one corporation, MetroPCS Communications, Inc. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:43 am by Dennis Crouch
Sotomayor would seem like the natural for Pottawattamie County, which involved the immunity of state prosecutors from civil liability, because Sotomayor served as a state criminal prosecutor under New York City’s Robert Morgenthau. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm
Defendant-petitioners in this case—executives of the publicly-held U.S. company Hollinger International, Inc. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:08 pm
Supreme Court, June 17, 2010 Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm by Erin Miller
Brief in opposition of respondents Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. et al. [read post]
However, the court of appeals erred in holding that section 30.016’s reference to a “tertiary recusal motion” is limited to a third motion filed by the same party against the same judge. [read post]