Search for: "PHILLIPS v. STATE" Results 1881 - 1900 of 2,870
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On Monday 28 and Tuesday 29 November 2011 the Court of Appeal (Lord Judge LCJ, Lord Neuberger MR and Maurice Kay LJ) heard the appeals in Phillips v NGN and Coogan v NGN against orders of Mr Justice Vos in phone hacking claims (see [2011] EWHC 349 (Ch)). [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Jack McNeill, Associate Library Director
Application of the remedial purpose canon to CERCLA successor liability issues after United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  On this third point, Mr Justice Birss (as he then was) provided an explanation as to the German injunction gap and the interaction with UK patent proceedings at [14]-[19] of his decision, summarizing previous decisions (HTC v Apple, ZTE, v Ericsson, Garmin v Phillips) where Mr Justice Arnold (as he then was) consistently expressed the view that the presence of a possible German injunction gap "was a factor to take into account". [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:58 am by Jesse Mondry
Putting a provision in your contract that United States law will apply does not mean the parties must bring their lawsuit in the United States. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am by NL
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am by NL
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 11:13 am by Lyle Denniston
Phillips, who used his ten minutes to good advantage. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 11:16 am by Jordan Brunner
Phillip Carter addressed three questions that loom for civil-military relations under Trump. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am by Graham Smith
” 18 months later Lord Phillips, giving the judgment of the whole Court of Appeal in Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd, said the opposite: “Thus copyright is antithetical to freedom of expression. [read post]