Search for: "People v. Case"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 52,291
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2008, 3:21 pm
Even there, the spectre of recall and electoral pressures are never entirely absent.So an interesting duo of death penalty cases today. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 11:42 am
The Cold Case reinvestigated the Boyson homicides, found some additional evidence against David, and in 2004, the district attorney prosecuted David for the murders.David's attorneys moved to dismiss the prosecution based upon the 24-year delay between the murders and the prosecution. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 11:58 am
It holds that even though there's a California Supreme Court case seemingly on point granting the motion to suppress, that case is distinguishable because there the officer actually saw the temporary tag, whereas here the officer didn't bother to look. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:53 am
Plus suggests that perhaps the appeal apparently concerns something that's at issue in a large number of cases and hence worthy of publication and social attention. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 12:15 pm
It's another case that, as a practical matter, both increases the authority of the police to combat crime as well as provides a powerful tool for individuals to harass their enemies. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:23 pm
But you'd rather dismiss the case, even with prejudice, than give it a shot in his courtroom? [read post]
31 May 2021, 7:09 am
The post Child Support Bullets Part 13: Family v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 4:34 pm
Which is different than courts in some other jurisdictions.Its reasoning (in part):"Unlike the sales tax law and administration described in several of the cases from other jurisdictions, California law does not obligate a merchant to collect a sales tax from the customer. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 11:24 am
Perhaps inconsistently with the holiday spirit, it's from the California Supreme Court, and it's a case in which the Court unanimously affirms a death sentence.Not that the prosecution was all that hard. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 11:53 am
This is a case where one of the jurors (allegedly) said that the defendant must be guilty because he didn't testify. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 11:13 am
In a death penalty case. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 4:07 pm
Lei's husband might also be happy I wasn't the trial judge in his case. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 12:06 pm
Though I'll mention briefly that I'm not too psyched about the prosecution's closing argument, and the California Supreme Court's theory that one can meaningfully distinguish between impermissible references to the Bible in a death penalty case versus permissible references (e.g., that Moses says it's okay) seems pretty weak to me.I'll directly mention only something that appears on page 223 (!) [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
I'm still not certain that Justice Humes gets it right, but nonetheless think that the amendments definitely add some force to his conclusion.Second, as to the "burglary tools" part of the case, the Court of Appeal now reaches a different result than it did initially. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 12:47 pm
Especially in a murder case, where there's a lot at stake.Plus, although Justice Greenwood's opinion doesn't mention it, I think there may also be a fairness principle at stake here. [read post]
22 May 2013, 4:58 am
No one.But that's what happens when a juror goes on the Internet and reads the published decision by the Court of Appeal in the case that's the exact one the juror's deciding on remand. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 1:26 pm
In that case, you don't go to prison. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 2:29 pm
This is, in my view, an exceptionally tough case. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 4:31 am
That case, along with People v Harris (from the Muskegon Circuit Court) and People v Parks (Ingham County)were granted leave for further appeal. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:35 am
Duraflame, Inc. v. [read post]
