Search for: "People v. Richard" Results 1881 - 1900 of 3,643
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2012, 9:18 am by dcassuto
To wit: SHELBY PROIE; KAREN MUNRO;                              Case #3:11-05955-BHS PATRICIA SYKES; ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, a non-profit corporation; and PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC., a non-profit corporation, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:43 am by Kevin Maillard
  This event commemorated the 1967 Supreme Court case of Loving v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Representatives Kevin Brady (R-Texas) and Richard Neal (D-Mass.) argued for replacing the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP), an amendment to the Social Security Act that reduces payments for people whose careers involved work in both the public and private sectors. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 16 and 17 July 2019, there was a trial in the case of Yavuz v Tesco Stores Ltd & anr before Richard Spearman QC. [read post]
2 May 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr reports that in Frank v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm by legalinformatics
Human Rights, Subjectivity and the Potential of Narrative Maggie Werner, Hobart & William: Heroes v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm by legalinformatics
Human Rights, Subjectivity and the Potential of Narrative Maggie Werner, Hobart & William: Heroes v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 6:23 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:31 am by Adam Chandler
” Howard Wasserman of Prawfsblawg and Mauro agree that the case does not interest many people, but both find reasons to pay attention. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Richard Weisberg, who has a distinctive take on The Merchant of Venice, was part of a group that put together its own version of the courtroom scene from that play. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 3:01 am
They are:Case T-278/04 Jabones Pardo v OHIM - Quimi Romar (YUKI). [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 6:27 am by INFORRM
On 22 or 23 June 2010, the Court of Appeal (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJJ) will hear the defendants’ appeal against the decision of Tugendhat J in Clift v Slough BC ([2009] EWHC 1150 (QB)) Judgment in British Broadcasting Corporation -v- Sugar heard on 17 May 2010 by Master of the Rolls, Moses and Munby LJJ will be given on 23 June 2010. [read post]