Search for: "Power v. Holder"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 2,842
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2012, 9:03 am
Development schemes are formulated between portfolio holders and managers. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
Written while Eldred v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm
As private law, enforcement decisions are delegated to rights holders. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:43 am
Statistically powerful distinction. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:34 pm
Bodemer v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 5:02 pm
Eli Lilly and Company, et al., Civil Action No. 2:12-62 and Marston v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 5:20 am
" Reese v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm
For example, in Pacific Merchant Shipping Association v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 8:24 am
David v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:02 pm
Holder. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:22 pm
In 1986, the Delaware Chancery Court said in Katz v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:36 pm
Holder — state law conviction for possessing small amount of marijuana as a basis for deportation 11-345 — Fisher v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 2:52 am
This conclusion was based on Case C-38/09 P Schräder v CPVO [2010] ECR I-03209 and on the purposeful amendment made to Article 73, Reg. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:18 am
Holder, has now been docketed as 12-81. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:45 am
Structurally, the draft Directive is organized into five Titles, containing General Provisions (I), rules on CMOs (II), MTL (III), Enforcement Measures (IV), and Reporting and Final Provisions (V). [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:35 pm
Armstrong prior to 2005; (3) its exclusive jurisdiction over the drug tests upon which USADA relies including tests in 2001 and 2009–10; (4) its authority to delegate disciplinary responsibility to USA Cycling; (5) its duty to review proposed disciplinary proceedings against its license-holders; (6) its obligation to review the evidence and determine whether it constitutes reliable means of proving an anti-doping violation before any anti-doping charge is brought against Mr. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 4:54 pm
If the power of the patents is roughly equal then the parties will settle. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 4:54 pm
If the power of the patents is roughly equal then the parties will settle. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:24 am
JEG v The Trustees of the Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan [2012] EWCA Civ 938 Elizabeth Anne-Gumbel QCand Justin Levinson of One Crown Office Row acted for the claimant in this case. [read post]
Beyond Users' Rights: Supreme Court Entrenches Technological Neutrality as a New Copyright Principle
16 Jul 2012, 12:24 am
It continues by stating that: ESA's argument is also consistent with this Court's caution in Théberge v. [read post]
