Search for: "Press v. State" Results 1881 - 1900 of 17,200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2017, 2:29 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Under the EU Directive 2000/78/EC, member states are required to prohibit discrimination in employment on various grounds including sexual orientation and the deadline for transposing this into domestic law was in 2003. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 3:15 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
However, the Supreme Court in the UK has previously held that the duty to provide a real opportunity for rehabilitation was an ancillary duty in the overall scheme of art 5 and existed throughout the prisoner’s detention (R (Kaiyam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 66). [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:07 am by INFORRM
So whilst there was a time when judicial disapproval of the revenue raised by sex scandal stories for newspapers was a factor against the press in these prior restraint cases, things have moved on. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 7:02 pm
The more pressing question is whether the commissioners court will listen to the Task Force on Indigent Defense ... or to anybody.See related Grits posts:Texas Lawyer: Dallas public defender lacked protection from political windsDallas public defender purge raises legal and policy questionsCost per case at Dallas Public Defender much lower than private practiceRothgery v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Yesterday a Notice of Appeal was filed in Nampa Classical Academy v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:34 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Americans trying to predict how the Supreme Court will rule on King v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:54 pm by Donna Eng
  Since I am a bit pressed for time, I decided to make a quick report of a few of the opinions released by the Florida Supreme Court on October 27, 2011. 1.) [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 4:20 pm
The News-Press, who ran the wire story, captures the timeline below along with the Herald's correction. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:34 pm
ELENA KAGAN: Senator Feinstein, I do think that the continuing holding of Roe and Doe v. [read post]