Search for: "RICHARD M. JUSTICE"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 2,983
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Marshall does not supply rule of decision in present proceeding -- Bankruptcy Court may hear FCCPA action, but it cannot enter final judgment without parties' consent, as FCCPA action is non-core proceeding -- Discussion of effect of defendant's admission of jurisdiction -- Even if court were to relieve defendant of its consent to jurisdiction and treat proceeding as non-core proceeding without both parties' consent, court would still hear proceeding -- Exercise of permissive… [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:44 pm
Richard P. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:44 pm
Richard P. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 8:12 am
I’ve crossed swords with Richard Sander before. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm
The Lord Chief Justice has said he does not want statutory regulation of the media. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 10:17 am
Richard W. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
The committee heard from The Sir Nicholas Wall P, Mr Justice Baker; Lord Neuberger MR and Mr Justice Tugendhat. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 8:49 pm
" I wonder if the Times editorial writer would be satisfied if, say, Judge Richard Posner and Justice Steven Breyer, the leading "pragmatists" on the bench, were put in charge of re-designing the curriculum, together with practicing lawyers, like, say, Brian Stevenson and Steven Bright, leading anti-capital punishment lawyers of this generation (who might enlist, say, my colleague Jordan Steiker, who helps to run a capital punishment clinic at the University of Texas… [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 7:45 am
The point is a valid one, and I’m glad he raised it. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 2:03 pm
Pattillo J.In May 2005 an action was started by Richard M. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
The author is David M. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 12:58 pm
The author is David M. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:03 am
The author is David M. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:52 am
” Richard W. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 3:41 am
The first case study that we conducted belongs to the domain of consumer justice, and was framed in the ONTOMEDIA project. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:19 pm
Photo: Richard Winchell/Flickr [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:39 am
Still, I'm sure that most of the people who sign these briefs would rather err on the side of caution, and have no interest in misleading the Justices about the basis for their signatures. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 1:59 pm
" - M. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 10:46 am
Lead Defense Counsel Richard Kammen states that this is correct. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 7:27 pm
Richard Kammen, I got it. [read post]
