Search for: "STAND et al. v. STATE."
Results 1881 - 1900
of 2,184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2009, 12:46 pm
The petition in Center for Auto Safety, et al., v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 2:52 pm
The case is Rasul, et al., v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 9:15 am
V. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) US CAFC grants en banc request to challenge written description requirement: Ariad v Lilly (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) (Washington… [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 3:32 pm
Both the Republican primary voters, and the general electorate, will thus get a chance to consider a choice of candidates and make a decision democratically, rather than a successor being hand-picked by the Gov. and bestowed with incumbency and fund-raising advantage just in time for election campaign season.TEXT O'NEILL'S DISSENTING OPINION IN In Re Columbia Medical Center of Las Colinas, Subsidiary L.P., et al. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 10:16 am
Successfully sued suggests that these cases were tried to a verdict, which in the case of Grillo v Pettiete et al Cause 96-145090-92 and Grillo v Henry Cause 96-167943-96 96th Dist, Ct Tarrant County, TX, simply wasn't true. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 9:31 pm
See District of Columbia et al. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 3:46 pm
Rita Cosby et. al. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 11:06 pm
News America Inc., et al., No. 2:2006-cv-10240 (E.D. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 1:58 am
Jacobson J has upheld Larrikin’s claim to be the owner of copyright in Kookaburra sits in the Old Gum Tree, which means, at least, that Larrikin has standing to sue Men at Work et al. for infringing copyright in that music. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
” State ex reI. 2 Dunlap v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 4:16 am
E.I. du Pont Nemours and Co. et al., No. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Microsoft et al. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 11:31 am
Today in Heipel v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:39 pm
CONNORS, a Minor, etc., et al., Real Parties in Interest. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 8:01 pm
In re Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing and Section 4(d) Litigation and Safari Club International, et al. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
No’ had been broadcast in Member States that affords special protection to film titles: Danjaq v OHIM, Mission Products (Class 46) Jesper Kongstad, Benoît Battistelli enter the fray in battle to be next EPO President (IAM) EPO sets deadline for presidential applications (Managing Intellectual Property) (IAM) The IP ecosystem (Innovationpartners) More work on draft council regulation on the EU community patent (BLOG@IP::JUR) Mr Bruno van Pottelsberghe calling for… [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
Tinker et al. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 6:54 pm
June 30, 2009) BACKGROUND: Plaintiffs Citizens for Better Forestry, et al. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:51 am
This is speculation, of course, but there is little else to suggest why the Court announced Monday that, next Term, it will review the case of Briscoe, et al., v. [read post]
