Search for: "STATE v COUNTS" Results 1881 - 1900 of 17,243
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2009, 3:57 am
Recently, a New York State Supreme Court Justice in Nassau County followed this rule when it dismissed four counts of Grand Larceny and one count of Scheme to Defraud against a defendant in connection to New York State's Lien Law. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 1:03 pm by Derek T. Muller
” All this does is repeal a conforming amendment to the Electoral Count Act of 1887, which sets the rules for Congress counting electoral votes from the states. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:19 pm by Josh Blackman
In my earlier post, I mentioned this passage reminded me of United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:35 pm by Barry Barnett
Twombly's record Counting today's ruling in Johnson v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 5:06 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
In August, the New York State Liquor Authority (“NYSLA”) charged a New York retailer, Empire Wine & Spirits, with sixteen counts of improperly shipping wine to out-of-state consumers in states including California, Illinois, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:22 am
Accordingly, Anderson could not be convicted of both crimes, and we will reverse his conviction with respect to count 2 and direct that count 2 be dismissed.People v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 3:05 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Hamilton Country Board of Elections, concluding 2–1 that the Board’s decision to count some miscast ballots but not others may have violated 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause as applied to ballot counting in Bush v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 8:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
United States, 487 F2d 1345, 1350 (Ct. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 5:08 pm by Zachary Spilman
On Monday, CAAF released it’s fourth opinion of the term in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 11:57 am by admin
Donald denied, on all counts, defendant Hilton Hotels’ motion for summary judgment of state and federal claims of discrimination and retaliation, allowing Kumar v. [read post]