Search for: "STATE v MURPHY"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 2,313
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2010, 2:21 pm
Murphy 2. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:00 am
(N v Secretary of State for the Home Department).Even if extreme destitution can be proved, there must be a close and direct link between the destitution and the actions of the state. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 1:04 am
We posted recently on the case of Holder v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 4:18 am
”To bolster its conclusion that questions 2-4 were unconstitutional, Justice Livingston's opinion cited the Supreme Court case of Minnesota v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:43 pm
Other cases of note includes yet another grant of relief in Arizona on aggravating factor (F)(6) (heinousness, cruelty, and depravity) in State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:26 am
The other day I talked about the decision in Holland v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:01 pm
Murphy Oil USA - Houston lawyer Kendall Gray of Andrews Kurth on his blog, The Appellate Record Playing Not to Lose is a Big Mistake - Law firm consultant Cordell Parvin on his Law Consulting Blog Jailed Convicts v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 2:00 pm
Finally, in 2004, an Illinois court explicitly held that a physician was not qualified to testify as to the standard of care for the nursing profession under the laws of the state of Illinois (Sullivan v Edward Hospital, 806 NE2d 645 [Ill 2004]). [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:15 am
The Fifth Circuit en banc dismissed the appeal in Comer v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 6:30 am
In State of Tennessee v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:22 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently dismissed the appeal in Comer v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:22 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently dismissed the appeal in Comer v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Murphy Oil Appeal – Dismisses Appeal on Procedural Grounds, Not Merits. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Murphy Oil Appeal – Dismisses Appeal on Procedural Grounds, Not Merits. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:27 am
Murphy, 521 U. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
In upholding Justice Warshawsky's marketability discount ruling in Murphy, the Second Department cited Hall v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 11:25 am
On the other hand, I’ve seen other appellate opinions do the same thing (see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:55 pm
” The Appellate Division ruled that the individual was entitled to such a hearing [Murphy v City of New York, 35 AD3d 319].Further, on the issue of “public disclosure,” courts have ruled that the internal disclosure of allegedly stigmatizing reasons for the discharge or demotion of an employee to agency administrators “having a right to know” does not constitute a public disclosure of such information and thus a name-clearing hearing" was not… [read post]
