Search for: "STATE v. DEAN" Results 1881 - 1900 of 2,638
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Courts can revisit their prior rulings, higher courts can change the legal landscape against which lower courts make decisions (as the Supreme Court in fact did in the immigration regulation setting in 2012 in Arizona v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Less than two years ago, the Supreme Court applied it in Murphy v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 1:10 pm by sydniemery
Gonzalez’s article The New Batson: Opening the Door of the Jury Deliberation Room After Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm by John Steele
Louisiana, the United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, overturned the presumption announced in Michigan v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union did not simply allow arbitrary actions by state actors—or not only that. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
Virginia State Board of Elections and Cooper v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 12:31 am by Lawrence Solum
For example, the noted constitutional law scholar and advocate, Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, has stated: Certainly from the perspective of lawyers who write briefs to the Justices and stand before them, there is often a sense of arguing to an audience of one. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:58 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Huffman’s article Margin of Error: Potential Pitfalls of the Ruling in The Prosecutor v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 12:05 am
The case, which had appeared to be a slam dunk for the prosecution, had its oddities. Newly Named Interim Dean Is First Woman to Lead Hofstra Law New York Law Journal Professor Nora V. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 1:40 pm
Supreme Court and American society at large, even post Lawrence v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:22 pm
 Kagan's enforcement as Harvard Law School dean of the school's non-discrimination policy led her, like just about every other law school dean in the country, to keep military recruiters officially off-campus, at least until the Supreme Court's decision in FAIR v. [read post]