Search for: "STATE v. RODRIGUEZ" Results 1881 - 1900 of 2,008
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2021, 10:19 am by Giles Peaker
So, clearing the decks… AA v Rodriguez & Ors (HOUSING – RENT REPAYMENT ORDERS – defence of “insanity”) (2021) UKUT 269 (LC) The Upper Tribunal found that in making Rent Repayment Orders for an unlicensed HMO, the FTT had not had sufficient regard to medical evidence and evidence from social workers that strongly suggested the landlord was suffering from serious mental health issues which would mean that he did not know his conduct in… [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Because lower courts are bound to follow this Court’s decisions until they are withdrawn or modified, however, Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:57 pm by Lyle Denniston
  And the key authority they cite for that proposition is the Supreme Court’s 1982 decision in Upham v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 8:44 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
  Last Monday, the United States Supreme Court denied a writ of certiorari to review the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling in McReynolds v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by Lucie Olejnikova
Team Members: Joseph Fortunato (3L), Sameer Ponkshe (3L) In this year’s competition titled United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:31 am by Sheppard Mullin
Rodriguez, 628 F.3d 1258, (11th Cir. 2010)); and a recruiter in California who downloaded customer lists to start a competing business (United States v. [read post]