Search for: "Sales v. State" Results 1881 - 1900 of 21,151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Tire maker entitled to recover on injunction bond for wrongful prohibition on sale of certain brand tires. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:46 am by CMS
His judgment stated that “the harm caused by the repudiation of the promise is not the same as the detriment suffered. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 1:04 pm by Adam Levitin
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court finally issued its long-awaited ruling in Eaton v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:26 pm by Kevin Kaufman
If we accept the state’s argument that it’s an excise tax, then it’s probably an unconstitutional one, because it fails to meet the nexus requirements established in cases like Complete Auto Transit v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:50 am by Erin Miller
The biggest news out of the Court yesterday was the opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 4:02 am by John Enser
It is not necessary, in addition, for the goods at issue to have been the subject, prior to the sale, of an offer for sale or advertising targeting consumers of that State.The Court relied on the earlier Phillips case which the IPKat looked at - not with an entirely happy face - here. [read post]