Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 4,115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
Ruth Ratowitz v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 12:34 am
Immunotherapy patent survives pessimistic mindsetMerck Sharp & Dohme v Ono Pharmaceutical [2015] EWHC 2973 (Pat), decided on 22 October by Mr Justice Birss in the Patents Court, England and Wales, is a decidedly unbifurcated ruling, being a full-blooded infringement-and-invalidity action running to 243 paragraphs. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 6:56 am
In fact, as we have previously reported, the latest official statistics show a sharp increase in the number of claims that have been issued. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:00 pm
Because the art market is opaque, diligence is needed to discover an object's true chain of custody, transfer, and ownership.The latest court case demonstrating the need for due diligence is United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:39 am
Merck Sharp & Dohme v Ono Pharmaceutical [2015] EWHC 2973 (Pat), decided on 22 October by Mr Justice Birss in the Patents Court, England and Wales, is a decidedly unbifurcated ruling, being a full-blooded infringement-and-invalidity action running to 243 paragraphs. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 11:19 am
Although it is a close call, the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Schrems v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 5:36 am
You have these dueling canons, and you have a rule that when the government sends somebody to jail for 10 years, it has to cross sharp corners. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 5:52 am
Triable issues of fact also existed regarding the presence of a causal link between the employee’s 2006 EEO complaint and her 2009 termination, said the court, denying summary judgment against her retaliation claim as well (Goode v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 6:18 am
Judging from this morning’s oral argument in Lockhart v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 6:01 am
Sharp words, which reflect a sharp disagreement about the scope of a judge’s power over litigants. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 1:12 pm
Wang: Art v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 11:38 am
The Journal tells us that the White House has approved a force of up to 50 U.S. personnel to “advise and assist” local forces in northeastern Syria, marking the first sustained U.S. ground deployment in the country and "the start of a sharp escalation in the level of U.S. involvement in the fight against Islamic State. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 2:06 pm
See Troy v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:11 am
Gerhart v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
However, there were questions of fact on whether this reason was pretextual because other employees were not disciplined for using similar devices (Sharp v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 10:58 am
In the closing days of its September term, the Illinois Supreme Court agreed to decide Vaughn v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 10:41 am
Compare Cheema v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 1:53 pm
The number of people answering "not in favor" to Gallup's poorly worded basic question is the highest it has been since before Furman v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 1:21 am
On 8 October 2015 Sir Michael Tugendhat heard an appeal from the Master in the case of Bates v Leeds United FC . [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 12:35 pm
Two current contestations show the dangers of this expanded power in sharp relief. [read post]
