Search for: "Starr "
Results 1881 - 1900
of 2,040
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2010, 3:39 pm
Starr and Reynolds reported streptomycin resistance in generic intestinal bacteria from turkeys that had been fed that antibiotic (4). [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 10:48 pm
Sheena Brandenburg “Puma Starr” Bradenburg, weighing in at 115 lbs. and standing at 5 feet 5 inches from Flint, Michigan, was also known as the “Puma Starr” in the cage. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 8:35 pm
Starr and Reynolds reported streptomycin resistance in generic intestinal bacteria from turkeys that had been fed that antibiotic (4). [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:37 am
Civil Practice (Thomson/West 2008) Business Litigation, § 27:28; 1 Miller & Starr, Cal. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 4:54 pm
In a published opinion filed October 21, 2024, the Second District Court of Appeal (Div. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 5:48 pm
In a 5-2 opinion filed August 1, 2022, a divided California Supreme Court held the Federal Power Act (“FPA”; 16 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:50 am
In a 51-page published opinion filed January 5, 2024, and resolving consolidated appeals, the Third District Court of Appeal rejected baseline, piecemealing/segmentation, impact analysis, project description, alternatives analysis, and failure-to-recirculate challenges to the EIR for the Department of Water Resources’ (“DWR”) approval of amendments to long-term water supply contracts with local government agencies receiving water through the State Water Project (“SWP”). [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
In a published opinion filed February 6, 2023, the Fourth District Court of Appeal (Div. 3) affirmed a judgment setting aside an addendum to a 2010 program EIR (PEIR) and accompanying approvals for a 275,000-square foot office complex on a 4.95-acre parcel (the “Gemdale project” or “project”) within the 2,800-acre Irvine Business Complex (IBC). [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
AB 890 (Medina – D), recently sent to Governor Brown for action by October 15, seeks to amend Government Code § 65867.5 and to add §§ 65363 and 65850.10 to prevent development agreements and certain types of land use planning and zoning legislation from being enacted by local voter-sponsored land use initiatives. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:08 pm
In an important published opinion filed February 16, 2024, the Fourth District Court of Appeal (Div. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:16 am
On May 12, 2022, the First District Court of Appeal filed a 108-page published opinion affirming a judgment denying a CEQA writ petition that challenged Marin County’s approval of a 43-lot single-family residential subdivision on a 110-acre parcel atop a mountain overlooking the Town of Tiburon and San Francisco Bay. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:44 pm
In a lengthy, partially published opinion filed November 21, 2017, the Fifth District Court of Appeal addressed four CEQA challenges asserted by plaintiffs and appellants (“AIR”) to the sufficiency of Kern County’s 2014 Final EIR for Real Parties’ (“Alon Energy”) project to modify an existing Bakersfield oil refinery. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:24 am
In a published opinion filed February 24, 2023, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 5) reversed a judgment upholding the adequacy of the EIR for the University of California, Berkeley’s long range campus development plan (“LRDP”) and a controversial housing development project at the historic People’s Park. [read post]
2 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Robert J. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:53 pm
In a partially-published, 150-page slip opinion resolving appeals in consolidated cases, and filed February 25, 2020, the Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part a trial court decision finding CEQA defects in the 1800-plus page EIR prepared for Kern County’s adoption of an ordinance designed to provide a streamlined, ministerial permitting process for new oil and gas wells in the county. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm
In a published opinion filed December 6, 2022, the Third District Court of Appeal reversed in part and affirmed in part the trial court’s judgment denying writ petitions in consolidated actions challenging the EIR for a major state government project affecting the Historic State Capitol Building and Annex in Sacramento. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 8:51 pm
Introduction And Overview On August 19, 2019, the California Supreme Court issued its unanimous 38-page opinion, authored by Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye, in the CEQA “project definition” case we’ve been tracking with interest. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 8:46 am
In an opinion filed on July 24, and later ordered published on August 19, 2024, the Second District Court of Appeal (Div. 4) affirmed the trial court’s judgment denying a writ petition challenging actions taken by the Los Angeles City Planning Commission (“CPC”) to facilitate and implement three components of the Westside Mobility Plan (the “Mobility Plan”). [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 4:54 pm
On August 11, 2015, the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) released a 145-page “Preliminary Discussion Draft” of “Proposed Updates to the CEQA Guidelines” (the “Discussion Draft”). [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 9:24 am
“You may say I’m a dreamer. [read post]
