Search for: "State v. D. Banks" Results 1881 - 1900 of 3,760
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
Supreme Court case, Lucia v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 9:44 am by Tod M. Leaven
§ 5301(d), which states “Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, payments of benefits under laws administered by the Secretary shall not be exempt from levy under subchapter D of chapter 64 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 6331 et seq.). [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 9:44 am by Tod M. Leaven
§ 5301(d), which states “Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, payments of benefits under laws administered by the Secretary shall not be exempt from levy under subchapter D of chapter 64 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 6331 et seq.). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:39 pm
Domino's relied on decisions from other states suggesting the language of the franchise agreement was dispositive on the issue of control. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:22 am
   B-DC: PACA claims are trust, not secured claims, so no req't (as per §506b) that claim be oversecured to get atty fees. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/JK-BK-DC-TEEL-10-4-11.pdf … B-AL: Truck lease w/ "Terminal Rental Adjustment Clause" (TRAC) is "true lease" and not lease intended as security. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/HB-BK-ND-AL-CADDELL-9-29-11.pdf … B-OH:… [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Constitution Daily reports on Hernandez v. [read post]