Search for: "State v Sullivan" Results 1881 - 1900 of 2,736
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2012, 3:01 pm
By allowing indirect purchasers who had no standing to sue under their state's antitrust laws to be part of the settlement class, the appellate majority has created a “come one, come all” environment that “sets the class action ship in [the Ninth] Circuit badly adrift,” the dissent argued.The decision is Sullivan v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
Kara Goad and Elizabeth Sullivan preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
  The court backpedaled from that a bit last year in Holland v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 9:04 am by Erin Kristofco
Sullivan & Cromwell, 922 F.2d 60, 73 (2d Cir. 1990) (excluding an expert's testimony as a result of the fact that he had been retained by the plaintiff on a contingency fee basis); Farmer v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:53 am
 Other cases this term that will settle longtime legal disputes include Sullivan v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 1:00 pm
We wonder, however, why we feel duty-bound to alert you to the new "pre-service removal" cases as they come down.Probably because no one else is paying attention to those cases, but they make an awful lot of difference to folks who toil in our field.Anyway, add Sullivan v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:51 am by Jonathan Witmer-Rich
  The first court decision discussing a delayed notice search warrant—that is to say, a covert search actually authorized in advance by a magistrate—is United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 2:44 am by Nicandro Iannacci
Ohio (1961), applying the exclusionary rule to the states; Gideon v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 2:54 pm
Judges Sullivan and Sharpnack. 2:00 PM - Laquania Wallace vs. [read post]