Search for: "State v. Burns"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 3,038
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2010, 11:16 am
Thornton (1995) -- rejected state imposition of term limits on members of Congress, holding that the Constitution prohibits states from adopting congressional qualifications in addition to those enumerated in the Constitution.Clinton v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Grants of Review TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF AGING AND DISABILITY SERVICES A/K/A BRENHAM STATE SCHOOL, ANTHONY V. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am
On cert., the state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:15 pm
The topic was the Texas v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:15 pm
The topic was the Texas v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 9:00 pm
In Illinois v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 8:06 pm
WWRD U.S. v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:50 am
That’s where 1st Judicial District Court Judge Kathy Seeley, a state judge, will oversee a 10-day trial in the case of Held v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:39 am
Anderson, 442 U.S. 921, 99 S.Ct. 2848, 61 L.Ed.2d 290 (1979); Burns v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:59 am
Over at the Washington Post last week, our own John Bellinger III previewed the Supreme Court arguments in Kiobel v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 6:03 am
The case, Wentworth v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 2:37 am
After all, the leading case on proscribable speech, Brandenburg v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:47 pm
Trademark Ownership Showdown Burning Man’s Burning Marks Trademark Attorney Ponders Parody — Yankees v Evil Enterprises [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 5:10 pm
E.g., Frio v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 8:32 am
Serbia and Croatia v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 10:16 pm
[09/19] Burns v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:36 am
The material facts in the case were similar to those in Leo v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 4:45 pm
Penal Code § 9.42; see, e.g., McFadden v. [read post]