Search for: "State v. C. Johnson" Results 1881 - 1900 of 1,961
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2009, 2:39 am
 A4235 Ortiz (MS) -- Lowers the per se intoxication level blood alcohol content to .06 percent blood alcohol content; repealer No Same asBLURB : V & T L. lower BAC levels Last Act: 03/11/09 enacting clause strickenA4516A Weinstein (MS) -- Relates to the accrual of merit time by certain inmates No Same asBLURB : Cor. merit time allowances Last Act: 03/11/09 amend and recommit to correction03/11/09 print number 4516aA6664 Hooper --… [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 8:19 am by admin
Main Street, Box C Hillsboro, Illinois 62049-0210 Phone: 217/532-9546 Fax: 217/532-9614 Morgan Theresa Lonergan 300 West State St. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Ideally, it would generate a brutally candid conversation—presumably, unlike the Philadelphia convention in 1787, open to the public through C-SPAN and other streaming services—about the adequacy of the Constitution to the American republic in the 21st century. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am by Mandelman
. ~~~ Filed 1/27/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE CLAUDIA JACQUELINE ACEVES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am by lawbod
Jeffery-Poulter, p. 148 – 150. [4] Dudgeon v the United Kingdom App no 7525/76 (ECtHR, 22 October 1981). [5] United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. [6] CEDAW/C/OP.8/GBR/1 2018 – paras. 83 – 85. [7] [2018] UKSC 27. [8] The Abortion Act 1967: a biography of a UK law, S. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 7:16 am
Springfield, IL 62704 Phone: (217) 782-9696 (V/TTY) Fax: (217) 524-5339 Web: http://www.state.il.usagency/ipcdd Down Syndrome Down Syndrome Development Counsel P.O. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:01 am
Supreme Court's decision in Medellin v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:01 am
Supreme Court's decision in Medellin v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:35 am
”[27]  By assuming that all cheerleading squads have the same purpose, WSF has not allowed room for judgments to be made on a case-by-case basis.[28]  c. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
First, the UK Government has been exemplary in ensuring the “seamless continuity” of the HCCH 2005 Choice of Court Convention throughout the uncertainties of the whole withdrawal process, as evidenced by the UK’s declarations and Note Verbale to the depositary Kingdom of the Netherlands.[17] The same applies mutatis mutandis to the HCCH 1965 Service Convention, to which all EU Member States are parties, and the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention, which has only been ratified so… [read post]