Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 1881 - 1900
of 15,315
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2007, 4:11 am
P. 12(b)(2) and for failure to state a claim regarding the non-copyright claims pursuant to Fed. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 1:25 pm
Consequently C had an obligation to (a) carry out a proportionality analysis of the impact of its decision on A’s and K’s Article 8 rights, and (b) consider whether taking up occupation in Ghana was in A’s son’s best interests, which were to be given primacy, following Lady Hale’s judgment in ZH v Tanzania. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 1:25 pm
Consequently C had an obligation to (a) carry out a proportionality analysis of the impact of its decision on A’s and K’s Article 8 rights, and (b) consider whether taking up occupation in Ghana was in A’s son’s best interests, which were to be given primacy, following Lady Hale’s judgment in ZH v Tanzania. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:17 am
In Kaufman v. [read post]
6 Sep 2006, 4:51 am
State v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Article 2(5) also permits extradition for offenses which are punishable by less than one year’s imprisonment, if extradition has been granted for a more serious extraditable offense specified in the request, and all other requirements of extradition have been met. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 1:26 pm
The Monomeles Protodikeio: an insider's viewLast December the IPKat reported on Case C-535/13 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v Maria Patmanidi SA, a request by a Greek court, the Monomeles Protodikeio Athinon, for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:31 am
§§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A, C, D), 846. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 1:34 pm
§ 2253(c)(2); and (3) whether Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
Dixon v. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Unfortunately, the Ninth’s 2004 decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:33 am
Merrill Primack v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
In addition to negotiating the agreement, George Frank signed an addendum to the agreement, addendum B, which is a credit card authorization expressly made ‘‘a part of the agreement . . . . [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm
Marks are getting longer over time b/c more is taken. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 4:00 am
B-3. [2] See section 178(1)(e), Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 1:49 am
Here, the judge disqualified B&C based on a violation of R.P.C. 1.7, which states, in pertinent part, that "a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 7:16 am
State v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:05 am
In Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
Pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence 201(b)(2) and 201(c)(2), the Court takes judicial notice of the offered documents.[2]C. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 3:05 pm
§ 841(b)(1)(C) is not a covered offense for purposes of the First Step Act. [read post]
