Search for: "State v. Core"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 7,963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2020, 9:17 am
AB v London Borough of Barnet. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
In a case referred to it by Belgium's Constitutional Court, the Court of Justice of the European Union in Centraal Israëlitisch Consistorie van België and Others v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 10:03 am
See also Branzburg v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:02 pm
The rules for initiating investigations are set out in Chapter IV and the enforcement rules are in Chapter V. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
In Dominguez v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 2:42 pm
On August 22, 2017, however, a federal court in the District of Columbia ordered the EEOC to reconsider this final rule on employer-sponsored wellness (AARP v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 12:13 pm
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 11:52 am
On 27 November 2020, the UK Supreme Court handed down judgment in the landmark case of Halliburton v Chubb [2020] UKSC 48, which has been keenly awaited by the international arbitration community. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:59 am
Bell v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 1:28 pm
[The fur defendant states in Texas v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Bork v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 6:49 pm
Program v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:16 pm
” These are core concerns of NSA, CIA, US Cyber Command, and the State Department, and hence the decision to identify the NCD as the president’s principal advisor on those topics would be a recipe for turf wars (ones the NCD would be poorly positioned to win) if not for the qualifying language I highlighted above, accentuating that the NCD’s particular function is to advise the president regarding coordination, not to act as the principal advisor about those… [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:40 am
In Muransky v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit disagreed, concluding that it was bound by its 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 12:05 pm
Monday’s argument in Van Buren v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:22 am
Doe 1 v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
Notably, the NIS Cooperation group has prompted EU Member States to conduct “an objective assessment of identified risks”.[15] Similarly, the guidelines of the EU toolbox advise EU Member States to avoid horizontal restrictions and to examine the risk profile of individual telecom equipment suppliers on the basis of both technical and strategic considerations,[16] focusing on an assessment of the critical parts of their key assets, namely their… [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 3:38 pm
Bullock and Rosenberger v. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 1:18 am
" Part II focused on Jacobson v. [read post]
