Search for: "State v. Hadding"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 124,535
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2011, 3:52 am
Regina (Modaresi) v Secretary of State for Health and others [2011] EWCA Civ 1359; [2011] WLR (D) 340 “The 14-day period allowed to a detained mental patient to lodge an application with the Mental Health Review Tribunal as provided by section 66 of the Mental Health Act 1983 and rule 32(1) the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Health, Education and Social Care Chamber) Rules 2008 was not to be considered to have expired where, though sent by fax on the last working… [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:02 am
Mohamed (Azza) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 331; [2012] WLR (D) 92 “The use of the superlative form in the phrase “the most exceptional compassionate circumstances” in paragraph 317(i)(e) of the Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules (1994) stressed how extreme such circumstances had to be in order for an applicant to be granted indefinite leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom as the parent or grandparent aged… [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:29 am
Regina (Elam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 29; [2012] WLR (D) 14 “The licence expiry date applicable to a prisoner serving consecutive terms of imprisonment including at least one term of 12 months or more was to be determined by the provisions of section 264(3) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 unless all the offences for which the sentences were imposed had been committed before section 264 came into force on 4 April 2005; in such a case, section… [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 6:11 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:18 am
Citing Barrett v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 10:31 am
State v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 6:24 am
U.S. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:30 pm
By Mike Dorf On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 10:23 am
Even in AT & T v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 1:05 pm
On December 10, 2013, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Sprint Communications Company v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 1:05 pm
On December 10, 2013, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Sprint Communications Company v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:25 pm
Regular contributor Paul Vinegrad, in comments to my previous posting, has been arguing that there’s no state action for purposes of the Confrontation Clause, as made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment, unless a state agent had something to do with the creation of the statement. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:25 pm
Regular contributor Paul Vinegrad, in comments to my previous posting, has been arguing that there’s no state action for purposes of the Confrontation Clause, as made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment, unless a state agent had something to do with the creation of the statement. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
See Atonio v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 10:30 am
U.S. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
In a near-unanimous decision yesterday in Virginia v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 11:26 am
Per the Associated Press, the jury has begun deliberating the capital MEJA case of United States v. [read post]
