Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 8,247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2014, 7:42 pm
Microsoft Corporation v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 6:00 am
State Council of Carpenters, 459 U.S. 519, 528 (1983); see also Leegin Creative Leather Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 12:40 am
Meade J has also stated that any decision the court makes on the FRAND royalty amount the iPhone maker must pay would apply worldwide, not just to its UK sales (in line with the UK Supreme Court decision last year in Unwired Planet v Huawei). [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 5:28 am
Last week, in Matter of Cale v Commissioner of Labor, 2007 NY Slip Op 09850, the Third Department held that if the professional position is eliminated by the employer the TN visa holder may not receive New York State unemployment insurance benefits. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:25 am
This has more recently been reaffirmed by the United States Supreme Court in Deepsouth Packing Co. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 7:40 am
Holder, and Evenwel v. [read post]
4 Sep 2016, 12:11 am
The court ruled in Vasquez v. [read post]
4 Sep 2016, 12:11 am
The court ruled in Vasquez v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 3:41 am
Suzor and Button-Sloan further state that "...the draft proposal is likely to have serious unintended consequences. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:06 am
Therefore, it would be unlawful and unfair to have ISP/IBPs bear the costs of [expensive] blocking injunctions whilst right holders have other [cheaper!] [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:55 am
In Limelight Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
The plaintiffs in Edakunni v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
The plaintiffs in Edakunni v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:08 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 12:00 am
Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 2:00 am
In Chudik V. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
The ACPA prohibits “cybersquatting,” which occurs “when a person other than the trademark holder registers the domain name of a well known trademark and then attempts to profit by either ransoming the domain name or by using the domain name to direct business from the trademark holder to the domain name holder.” DaimlerChrysler v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:00 pm
(On the Application of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1388 (Admin) - read judgment 1 Crown Office Row’s John Joliffe appeared for the Secretary of State the Home Department in this case. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 7:14 pm
A Second Circuit panel has affirmed, in United States v.Kassar (2d Cir. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:37 am
Perry, the challenge to California’s Proposition 8, and United States v. [read post]
