Search for: "State v. KAVANAUGH"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 2,848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2019, 5:00 am
United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 8:24 am
When Justice Brett Kavanaugh replaced Kennedy, some court-watchers predicted that this trend of broader Eighth Amendment readings would end, a prediction supported by the court’s decision in Madison v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 10:33 am
Kavanaugh read Alito’s opinion broadly as rejecting the 1971 test for the establishment clause in Lemon v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 7:42 am
A few months before the Espinoza grant, this issue was foreshadowed in Kavanaugh’s statement respecting the denial of certiorari in a historic-preservation case, Morris County Board of Chosen Freeholders v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 3:47 am
At his eponymous blog, Sheldon Nahmod maintains that Knick v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:56 am
In Rehaif v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 12:18 pm
Early on, in a cert petition involving state Medicaid funding for Planned Parenthood and other health-care providers, Roberts and Kavanaugh joined the liberal wing in denying certiorari. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 11:13 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 7:44 am
In Espinoza v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 4:23 am
United States, “which fires a loud shot across the bow of the administrative state. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
United States. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 3:26 am
New York, “the next big fight will be whether states can draw legislative lines based only on the citizen voting age population. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 11:13 am
With more than two-thirds of the states gaining more power under a one-state-one-vote system, it is difficult to believe that the convention will agree to award states votes based on population. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 3:27 am
” At The Federalist Society blog, Ashley Baker remarks that Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s opinion in Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
In Department of Commerce v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
Surrounded by 5-4 nail-biters, the 3-3-3 split generated by Virginia Uranium v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 5:30 am
New York would seem to establish a point on a spectrum of deference to agencies’ stated rationales, opposite that of Hawaii v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:30 am
En el caso Return Mail v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm
In Kisor v. [read post]
