Search for: "State v. Lawrence"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 3,073
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2010, 9:49 am
The case is styled Perry v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
Lawrence Hurley of ClimateWire (via the New York Times) and the New York Times’s Green blog discuss an amicus brief filed Monday by three Republican lawmakers in American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:15 am
On April 30, 2012, in an opinion written by Lawrence P. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 6:07 am
V. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 2:00 pm
This was seven years prior to Lawrence v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 2:58 pm
On Sept. 1, the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument of the appeal of the trial court’s ruling in that case finding that DADT unconstitutionally burdened the right of liberty established by our seminal Lawrence v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 2:01 pm
Two of our California cases have had a big impact on the way schools in that state and nationwide address the pervasive problem of anti-gay harassment: Loomis v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:30 am
David SchwartzNext week, in Colorado Dept. of State v. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 9:27 am
: Chisholm V. [read post]
24 May 2011, 12:26 am
See Nardone v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 5:58 am
Veugeler, Cardiovascular Sciences, Inc., and Lawrence H. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 12:17 pm
In Habeas Corpus Resource Center v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 10:28 am
Fisherman and Lawrence v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 8:04 am
Upon discovering Kurtzrock’s violation of Brady v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 12:30 pm
One might think that the very conservative Supreme Court’s refusal to overrule Roe and recognize a right to homosexual sodomy in Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:59 am
" In Lawrence E. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
Trump v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 6:53 am
The brief is available on the Reporters Committee Web site.The case is Forum Communications v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 3:36 am
In an op-ed for The Hill, Jonathan Nash suggests that two words in Armstrong v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:47 pm
*The irony is that, under the last administration, Chuck Rosenthal set Curry aside to argue before the Supreme Court in Lawrence v. [read post]
