Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 25,995
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2012, 7:43 am
In a June 11, 2012 decision (Chapter 7 Trustee v Gate Gourmet, Inc, Carnes, E), the Eleventh circuit determined that a pregnant employee who was denied light duty by her supervisor and then terminated did not need to provide evidence of a nonpregnant coworker who was treated more favorably in order to defeat summary judgment on her pregnancy discrimination claim. [read post]
15 Oct 2024, 2:45 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court on Tuesday sent a challenge to a Pennsylvania law barring people 18- to 20-years-old from carrying guns back to the lower courts for another look in light of last term’s decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
In light of the Sackett v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 2:00 pm
In Kullar v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:12 am
State v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:37 am
F.J.A.P. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 12:05 pm
[It does not shed light on why Champagne Louis Roderer filed suit in the great non-wine-making state of Minnesota.] [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:39 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 12:36 pm
Regarding mutuality, the Order states: “In light of [AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 11:14 am
Airways v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 11:14 am
Airways v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 11:14 am
Airways v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 6:10 am
As Ben noted last month, Judge Bates recently has shown some interest in possibly moving the Boumediene-at-Bagram case, Al Maqaleh v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 7:07 pm
Wolf requires courts to enforce express trusts recited in general-church governing documents (as some jurisdictions hold), or whether such a trust is enforceable only when it would otherwise comply with state law (as others hold); (2) whether retroactive application of the neutral-principles approach infringes free-exercise rights; and (3) whether the neutral-principles approach endorsed in Jones remains a constitutionally viable means of resolving church-property disputes, especially in… [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am
Findings of fact 8 and 10 state: 8. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 2:12 pm
US law has also protected geographic indications through common law trade mark law without need for a registration ( the "Cognac" case - Institut National Des Appellations v Brown-Forman Corp (TTAB 1998)).However, when it comes to produce and products which are of such strong cultural and heritage state significance like the New Mexico chile, it is the state's government that usually applies for a certification mark. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 9:53 am
The court held in State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 9:53 am
The court held in State v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 2:45 am
It stated that the documents of the EPO examination proceedings cited by the parties shed no new light on its interpretation. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 1:36 pm
I want to focus on the federal district court’s reasoning about why, in light of United States v. [read post]
