Search for: "State v. London"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 3,558
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2017, 7:29 am
Supreme Court to hear arguments in the Kaley v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:15 pm
Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Libel Cases The Court of Appeal for Ontario has released Paulsson v.... [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 7:09 am
In Gentile v. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 4:51 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 7:12 am
Charter 77 and the Human Rights in Czechoslovakia (London: Allen & Unwin, 1981). [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 9:12 am
The United States District Court for the District of Maryland has said no to the Ancient Coin Collectors Guild’s (ACCG) request to challenge issues previously argued in the case of Ancient Coin Collectors Guild v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 10:09 am
The AmeriKat in standard essential formAt the last day of June, the First Joint Seminar on SEP/FRAND Mediation and Arbitration co-organised by Queen Mary University of London’s School of International Arbitration (SIA) and the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center was hosted at the London offices of Allen & Overy LLP. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 8:39 am
In copyright cases, the courts of some countries have treated copyright infringement claims as transitory (e.g., London Film in the United States, Lucasfilm in the United Kingdom). [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 6:22 am
In KSR v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 2:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 02/03/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors,… [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 11:57 am
Moore et al. v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:06 am
The distinctive dog deviceAzumi Ltd v Zuma's Choice Pet Products Ltd [2017] EWHC 609 is a case about a dog's purpose. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 1:27 pm
PulseOn's design shared the fate of those in PMS v Magmatic, Samsung v Apple and P&G v RB: valid, but not infringed.Is it still worth bothering to register designs? [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 6:59 am
I would be more than delighted to gain that experience either in London or Southern England preferably but, should the right opportunity arise, I would gladly work anywhere in the UK. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
The first was on The State of Creativity: The Future of 3D Printing, 4D Printing and Augmented Reality. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 1:18 am
Pre-action disclosure is generally "desirable" where the information is only known to one of the parties (see XL London Market v Zenith [2004], Birse v HLC [2006] and Briggs v The Governors of Southfield School for Girls [2005]). [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am
Insofar as Mostyn J had previously determined otherwise in cases such as DL v SL [2015] EWHC 2621 (Fam); [2016] 1 WLR 1259 and Appleton v Gallagher, he was wrong: Gallagher at [33]-[34]. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:00 am
London Borough of Lambeth v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & Ors, heard 21 May 2019. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 11:42 pm
The conscious mind, on the other hand, thinks linearly, only able to handle one thought at a time.NOW, think about how the USPTO analyzes whether claims in patent applications are novel and nonobvious, and especially think about the debate on combination inventions presented in KSR v. [read post]
