Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2010, 5:39 am
The article merely stated that “questions were raised” about her due diligence. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:38 am
Issa and Others v Turkey; Bankovic and Others v Belgium and Others), but the facts in Al-Skeini - regarding the general state of affairs and the specific situations in which the shootings occurred - were not all that much stronger. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 10:52 pm
George V lived closer to our own time. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 10:36 pm
Chessman (34 P. 2d 679 (1959) at page 699) and People V. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:09 pm
As the Court explained in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:33 am
Mark the name United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 3:49 pm
Dille v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:22 am
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
(s.2(2)) The test has been long-established, and was stated by Lord Diplock in Attorney General v English[1980] AC 116 at 141H-142C: If, as in the instant case, and probably in most other criminal trials upon indictment, it is the outcome of the trial or the need to discharge the jury without proceeding to a verdict that is put at risk, there can be no question that that which in the course of justice is put at risk is as serious as anything could be. [read post]
28 May 2018, 10:43 am
The state of Ohio allows the penalty for those older than eighteen.A recent court decision in Commonwealth of Kentucky v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:54 am
However, both Lord Wilson and Lord Hodge are extremely kind and the discussions are so engaging that I soon forgot my nerves. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 10:55 pm
In Bryan v UK the European Court stated: 37. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 4:43 am
Lord Neuberger, the Master of the Rolls, last year ordered a writ of habeas corpus to ensure Rahmatullah’s release. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:16 am
” This refers to the judgment of the House of Lords in the Naomi Campbell case. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 10:20 pm
While it is not possible to develop this point in more detail here, it suffices to state that what Lord Hoffmann really appears to have intended is a test to distinguish cases in which legislative intent is consistent with a degree of artificiality (for instance Lord Hoffmann’s own example of conveyancing) from those in which it is not. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:31 pm
A v B plc (the Flitcroft case) [2003] QB 195 – Lord Woolf CJ gave the judgment of the court in this now notorious and discredited privacy case – Laws and Dyson LJJ were the other members of the Court. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:59 pm
Previous Conditions Lady Justice Smith and Lord Justice Mummery both considered whether the conditions in which the person concerned had lived previously were relevant. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am
Constitutional Affairs, Equalities, Home Affairs, Justice and Law – Lord McNally/Lord Taylor of Holbeach, Main Chamber, House of Lords.. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 1:00 am
Scotch Whisky Association & Ors v the Lord Advocate & Anor (Scotland), heard 24-25 Jul 2017. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 10:03 am
The Lord then confronted Eve, who immediately pointed the finger at the serpent: “And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat. [read post]
