Search for: "State v. Murphy " Results 1881 - 1900 of 2,307
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2010, 6:26 am by Jeff Gamso
The other day I talked about the decision in Holland v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:01 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Murphy Oil USA - Houston lawyer Kendall Gray of Andrews Kurth on his blog, The Appellate Record Playing Not to Lose is a Big Mistake - Law firm consultant Cordell Parvin on his Law Consulting Blog Jailed Convicts v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 2:00 pm
Finally, in 2004, an Illinois court explicitly held that a physician was not qualified to testify as to the standard of care for the nursing profession under the laws of the state of Illinois (Sullivan v Edward Hospital, 806 NE2d 645 [Ill 2004]). [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:22 am by Kelly Becker
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently dismissed the appeal in Comer v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:22 am by Liskow & Lewis
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently dismissed the appeal in Comer v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
 In upholding Justice Warshawsky's marketability discount ruling in Murphy, the Second Department cited Hall v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 11:25 am by Eugene Volokh
On the other hand, I’ve seen other appellate opinions do the same thing (see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:55 pm
” The Appellate Division ruled that the individual was entitled to such a hearing [Murphy v City of New York, 35 AD3d 319].Further, on the issue of “public disclosure,” courts have ruled that the internal disclosure of allegedly stigmatizing reasons for the discharge or demotion of an employee to agency administrators “having a right to know” does not constitute a public disclosure of such information and thus a name-clearing hearing" was not… [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 1:50 am by Kevin LaCroix
    Fifth Circuit Makes a Hash of the Climate Change Case: As I noted in a prior post, the October 2009 Fifth Circuit opinion in the Comer v. [read post]