Search for: "State v. Rowe" Results 1881 - 1900 of 3,523
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2012, 2:39 am by SHG
  And the Supreme Court shouldn't stick its nose into states' rules that would put a man to death without review because a law office, even one with as much mahogany and marble as Sullivan & Cromwell, screwed up.Justice Scalia made the point more clearly in Holland v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 6:30 pm by Ernster the Virtual Library Cat
  Maples, an  Alabama death row inmate challenging his murder convictions on constitutional grounds (ineffective assistance of counsel) , was represented pro bono at the state level by two lawyers from a prominent New York Law firm. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:33 pm by Joe Palazzolo
The WSJ’s Jess Bravin and Joanna Chung report on the Supreme Court’s opinion in Maples v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:37 pm by David Lat
Thomas [Supreme Court of the United States via SCOTUSblog] Maples v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:03 pm
On January 17, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed the award issued by an arbitral panel in 2007 in the case of Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 7:56 am by Kali Borkoski
By a vote of seven to two, the Court reversed the decision of the Eleventh Circuit, holding that death row inmate Cory Maples has shown the requisite “cause” to excuse his procedur­al default, which occurred when his lawyer missed a filing deadline in state court. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 7:41 am by Steve Hall
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 5:09 am by Adam Wagner
Canned 1 Crown Office Row’s Philippa Whipple QC was leading counsel to the Gibson Inquiry. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 am by Melina Padron
BBC and Dominic Casciani v Secretary of State for Justice High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) [2012] EWHC 13 (Admin) January 11, 2012 High Court rules Justice Secretary’s refusal to grant BBC permission to have a face? [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:42 pm by Steve Hall
  The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]