Search for: "State v. Sharp"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 2,611
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am
, has expressed concern, stating: “Matters of such public importance and interest should be allowed to be discussed freely and with the highest degree of legal protection.” Next week in the courts On Monday 31 October 2011, the trial of El Naschie v MacMillan Publishers Ltd will begin before Sharp J (without a jury). [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
I particularly appreciated Breyer’s sharp observation that a court “should never be influenced by the weather of the day but inevitably . . . will be influenced by the climate of the era. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm
United States, where the court is being asked to rule on the permissibility of the police using phone records without a warrant. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 6:45 pm
State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:12 pm
Yet you don't hear any textualists calling for the overruling of Bolling v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:52 am
State Department. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 10:57 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 11:19 am
University of North Carolina, United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 7:46 am
Today the United States asks this court to reconsider and overrule its decision in Roe v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 1:37 am
The Commission has contacted EU member states to trace any Bluesky offices within the region but has not reached out to the company directly. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:44 pm
., v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:44 pm
., v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
The group’s e-petition calls on the Ministry of Justice to “leave FoI alone”, stating, “the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOI) has exposed the scandal of MPs’ expenses, and many examples of waste and improper behaviour by public authorities, politicians and public officials. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm
Graham v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:53 am
This paper critically examines the Singapore Court of Appeal’s decision in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Merck KgGA, which offers a cooperative vision of transnational res judicata that strikes a balance between comity and mutual trust between national legal systems, and each system’s own sovereign and constitutional responsibilities and interests. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm
KJH v HGF [2010] EWHC 3064. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:34 am
On Monday, June 24, Justice Ginsburg summarized her sharp disagreement with the ruling in Fisher v. [read post]
