Search for: "State v. State" Results 1881 - 1900 of 258,369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2024, 9:56 am by Katharina Schmid (schmid-ip)
The case-law of a Member State, while it is not binding on the EU Courts, may provide relevant indications about the relevant public’s perception of the sign at issue in that state (see para 58, with reference to GC judgment T-40/03 – Julián Murúa Entrena, EU:T:2005:285, para 69). [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:56 am by Katharina Schmid (schmid-ip)
The case-law of a Member State, while it is not binding on the EU Courts, may provide relevant indications about the relevant public’s perception of the sign at issue in that state (see para 58, with reference to GC judgment T-40/03 – Julián Murúa Entrena, EU:T:2005:285, para 69). [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 8:22 am by Sang-Min Kim
” Aftering making these determinations, the Court articulated the legal consequences for both Israel and other States. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 7:01 am by Mayberry Law Firm
Florida, like all states, must adhere to these federal guidelines but also interprets Miranda issues through its state courts. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The court properly dismissed plaintiff’s claim pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) because he failed to state a cause of action (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87 [1994]). [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
United States (9th Cir. 1989) (no right of access to ex parte warrant application before indictment); States v. [read post]