Search for: "THE UNITED STATES et al"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 8,482
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2019, 1:51 pm
See United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 8:15 am
"Yesterday the defendants filed their reply brief, and they keep pursuing each and every attack vector (this post continues below the document): 19-10-25 Avanci Et Al. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 12:22 pm
(MJ Lee et al. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 6:45 pm
'" A study of publication in emergency medicine and critical care journals found that "[w]hen Purchasing Power Parity was considered, compared to United States authors, article process charges were shown to be 2.24 times more expensive for South African authors, 1.75 times more for Chinese authors, 2.28 times more for Turkish authors and 1.56 times more for Brazilian authors. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 9:30 am
., B-417353 et al. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Khalid Shaikh Mohammad et al. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
Walt Disney Company, 2019 ONSC 5916 [40] As stated above, all of the defendants are incorporated in and have their principal places of business in the United States. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 1:57 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 7:38 am
Baker Petrolite, LLC et al – United States District Court – Southern District of Mississippi – October 22nd, 2019) involves a hydrochloric acid (HCI) spill. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 11:10 am
Ali Ayyoub et al. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 9:41 am
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. et al – United States District Court – Southern District of California – October 21st, 2019) involves a claim of false advertising and unfair competition. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 8:21 am
Dick’s Sporting Goods Inc et al – United States District Court – District of South Carolina – October 18th, 2019) involves a products liability case involved a CORE Bioflex athletic cup, manufactured by the defendant Shock Doctor and sold by the defendant Dick’s Sporting Goods. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
After losing before the New Jersey Supreme Court, Princeton appealed to the United States Supreme Court with an absurd argument that their institutional First Amendment rights were violated by requiring that it allow people like my client on campus. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:09 am
Scott et al., No. 2:18-cv-00167 (D. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 5:27 pm
The Board’s Determination The Board had determined that the ’221 Patent claims were obvious in view US Patent No. 5,474,498 (Schnur), in view of Gibbs et al. (2000) “Anticancer Drug Targets: Growth Factors and Growth Factor Signaling”, 105 J. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 7:09 am
Avanci et al. case.Edmund Mangold, a co-inventor of multiple patents, is patent counsel at BMW. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 11:41 am
United States (Fiduciary Trust) Caddo Nation of Oklahoma v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 11:04 am
United States (Fiduciary Trust) Caddo Nation of Oklahoma v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 2:25 pm
Weinstein et al. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am
., et al. v. [read post]
