Search for: "THOMAS v. US GOVERNMENT" Results 1881 - 1900 of 5,530
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2009, 12:53 pm by charley foster
As with most important land use and environmental cases, inversecondemnation's Robert Thomas has background and links to briefs. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 1:31 pm
In determining this, we first consider the plain import of the words used. [read post]
But a worthier source than we, Professor Thomas Merrill, beat us to the punch, and posted his detailed preview of the case on SCOTUSblog here. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:45 am by Amy Howe
  In City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
The OBSCC found 24 regional police forces, the British Transport Police, the Civil Nuclear Constabulary, the Ministry of Defence and the National Crime Agency used CCTV cameras on their premises made by Chinese companies Dahua, Hikvision and Huawei, Taiwan’s Nuuo, or US-based Honeywell, which uses Chinese-made components. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:14 am by Scott Bomboy
In his dissent, Justice Thomas said, “For those of us who work in marbled halls, guarded constantly by a vigilant and dedicated police force, the guarantees of the Second Amendment might seem antiquated and superfluous. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:51 am by Amy Howe
” At the Knowledge Center of the Council of State Governments, Lisa Soronen discusses the Court’s recent grant in another redistricting case, Shapiro v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:13 am by Michael Grossman
This can be traced back to the outcome of Pliva, Inc. v Mensing in 2011. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 1:32 pm by Calvin Massey
  Perhaps the cleanest analysis was provided by Justice Thomas. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:54 am by Rory Little
The pun seems inevitable: In Wednesday morning’s oral argument in Class v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:15 am
In Jones, the Supreme Court concluded that placement of a GPS tracking device on a vehicle and the use of the device constituted a search for purposes of the 4th Amendment because `[t]he Government physically occupied private property for the purpose of obtaining information. [read post]