Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California" Results 1881 - 1900 of 11,377
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2015, 12:03 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The First District Court of Appeal held the California State Lands Commission’s (“CSLC”) EIR for a project involving the lease of sovereign lands beneath San Francisco Bay for private dredge mining of sand complied with CEQA; however, it partially reversed the trial court’s judgment denying a writ because the record failed to demonstrate CSLC’s compliance with the public trust doctrine. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 12:04 pm by Richard Frank
 The Ninth Circuit, however, concluded that the defendants’ removal of the case to federal court was improper, and remanded it back to California state court for resolution on the case’s merits. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 11:33 am
Warren, a retired California judge and former president of the National Center for State Courts. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 11:14 am
The court reasoned that the rule treats Morrison no differently than it treats North Carolina citizens and residents:Morrison has been held to no more onerous requirements for admission to the North Carolina bar than any citizen of North Carolina. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 9:13 pm
To make matters worse, Frankovich faces a State Bar trial for alleged ethics violations on Dec. 2. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:10 am by David DePaolo
If the defendant didn't feel that there was an injury in California, microtrauma or not, it should have not stipulated to such.But it did and as a consequence, based on long standing, well established California law, jurisdiction was asserted.I doubt the Court of Appeals will find differently. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:14 am
You can do far more with this study, though, than settle your next bar bet on the land speed record for voir dire. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 5:06 am
Trial Court Properly Entered Judgment for Defense in Class Action by Engineers, Employed by Firms Working under Contract for County, because Engineers were not “Common Law Employees” of County California State Court Holds Plaintiff-engineers filed a putative class action against the County of Los Angeles alleging that they had been designated improperly as employees of the independent contractors hired to perform work for the County,… [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 12:03 pm
This activity has been approved for one hour of Minimum Continuing Legal Education credit by the State Bar of California. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 11:18 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
That's when the State Bar of California will present its 20th Anniversary Environmental Law Conference at Yosemite® (yes, it is trademarked), at the Tenaya Lodge in Fish Camp, California. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:01 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
App. 4th 1427 (2010), a panel of the the California Court of Appeal expressly applied the filed rate doctrine to bar a consumer protection claim based on an insurance companies act of charging allegedly excessive insurance premiums. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:51 am by Adam Solomon
However, the court ruled that these additional statements were not actionable - first, plaintiff had made it clear that she was not alleging that the amount of fats stated on the products were misrepresented by CytoSport, only that such statements distracted customers from the unhealthy nature of Muscle Milk products. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
State, 73 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. 2000) ............................................................................ 15 California First Amendment Coalition v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
Cain 14-567Issue: (1) Whether, when evaluating if a state court’s decision is based upon an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence before the state court under 28 § U.S.C. 2254(d)(2), the clear and convincing standard of Section 2254(e)(1) governs the determination of unreasonableness; (2) whether the state court decision, finding no deficient performance, constituted an unreasonable application of Strickland… [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm by Anthony Zaller
Indeed, no reported California state court decision has endorsed the Ninth Circuit’s reasoning, and we are of the view that California courts “have been clear in their expression that section 16600 represents a strong public policy of the state which should not be diluted by judicial fiat. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
A District Court in California remanded the action to state court finding that use of the term, "any defendant" in 28 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 3:45 pm by rquintilone
However, in California and most other states, state law prohibits employers from making tip credits. [read post]