Search for: "United States v. Article of Drug"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 2,497
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
Article V(1) states that extradition shall not be granted for political offenses. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
KISSINGER Secretary of State EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND The Government of the United States of America and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; Desiring to make provision for the reciprocal extradition of offenders; Have agreed as follows: ARTICLE I Each Contracting… [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 4:45 am
Wolfe v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm
An offense against the laws relating to narcotics, dangerous drugs or psychotropic substances. 29. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am
This is true at the time of the commission of the offence, and remains true when the offender is imprisoned, as has been recognised in the case of Hirst v United Kingdom (No. 2) (2006) 42 EHRR 41. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 6:52 pm
SEE UNITED STATES v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 6:08 pm
See United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:00 pm
KISSINGER Secretary of State EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND The Government of the United States of America and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; Desiring to make provision for the reciprocal extradition of offenders; Have agreed as follows: ARTICLE I Each Contracting… [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:53 am
It concluded that the parties had so agreed.The court pointed to the fact that the Richfield Springs collective bargaining agreement specifically included a clause stating that prescription drug coverage was to be provided by Prescription Card Services (PCS). [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:03 pm
That new practice received an enthusiastic endorsement when the Ninth Circuit handed down its initial en banc opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm
& Lib. at 760-61.The article interprets these statistics as showing – counterintuitively – that “there is broad parity between state and federal courts on preemption. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:02 am
“After the judge makes a determination as to damages, we will consider our options,” Panico said in his statement.The case is State of South Carolina v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
They were not inspired by article 5(1)(f) of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and it does not follow that, because detention would be permissible under article 5(1)(f), it is also permissible under United Kingdom law. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:03 am
Zherka v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:59 am
Zherka v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:08 am
Risperdal is different from other antipsychotic medicines and “doctors needed to know that,” he added.Jurors will begin deliberating the case tomorrow.The case is State of South Carolina v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:00 pm
We cannot regard that as a satisfactory situation, or think that such a result was ever intended by those who drafted the Scotland Bill 1998 or the United Kingdom Parliament which passed it. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
United States also is a reminder of the real people behind the court's cases. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 9:48 pm
Levine, the United States Supreme Court upheld consumers' rights to sue drug manufacturers in state court for undisclosed drug side effects. [read post]
