Search for: "United States v. Cores" Results 1881 - 1900 of 3,430
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2014, 4:49 am by SHG
Under the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment, the government generally “has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content” (United States v Stevens, 559 US 460, 468 [2010] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 6:29 am
Bush,…has no power to order the release of prisoners held by the Executive for seven years, where the Executive detention is indefinite and without authorization in law, and release into the continental United States is the only possible effective remedy. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 12:26 pm by Dan Michaluk
From April. #4 United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:36 am by Ryke Longest
The United States supported the report’s recommendations. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:18 pm by Kent Scheidegger
"  Twice in recent years  the United States Supreme Court has affirmed the constitutionality of JLWOP for murder cases, first in the Roper v Simmons decision in 2005, then in 2010's Graham v Florida decision. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:46 am by Rebecca Tushnet
What’s the relevance of the economist v. legal scholars? [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:18 am
Let's just say the documentation around CTA's receipt of AutoCAD seemed murky. 9th Circuit cases: As far as applicable Ninth Circuit precedent, the court found an answer favorable to Vernor in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 8:37 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
As Douglas J., dissenting in United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 7:32 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Civil process may be employed in a common law criminal contempt prosecution, as was the case in United Nurses. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
State Laws Forcing Publishers to License Ebooks to Libraries Are Unlawful [PDF] — A new white paper from Free State Foundation explains, “As the District Court in AAP v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:31 am by George M. Wallace
The Court's decision, in the case of Curious Theater Company v. [read post]