Search for: "United States v. Edward"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 2,278
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Edward J. [read post]
29 May 2010, 6:33 am
Bradford Edward Ableson, Captain United States Navy (CLICK ABOVE) ~~~~~~~~~~ Men of the USS STARK (FFG – 31) – 17 May 1987 (click here) USS Stark casualties SN Doran H. [read post]
27 May 2010, 8:32 am
Edwards of the U.S. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 4:53 pm
United States Magistrate Judge Edward M. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:40 am
[This case was argued by Edward DuMont. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:41 pm
” State v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 1:26 pm
” State ex rel. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:40 am
Nor is it unlikely that the result of such enemy litigiousness would be a conflict between judicial and military opinion highly comforting to enemies of the United States. [read post]
21 May 2010, 9:09 am
Chief Judge David Sentelle’s opinion (joined by Judge David Tatel and Senior Judge Harry Edwards) opens: Three detainees at Bagram Air Force Base in Afghanistan petitioned the district court for habeas corpus relief from their confinement by the United States military.1 Appellants (collectively “the United States” or “the government”) moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction based on § 7(a) of the Military… [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:55 am
The opinion for the court, by Chief Judge David Sentelle and joined by Judge David Tatel and Senior Judge Harry Edwards, begins: Three detainees at Bagram Air Force Base in Afghanistan petitioned the district court for habeas corpus relief from their confinement by the United States military.1 Appellants (collectively “the United States” or “the government”) moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction based on § 7(a) of… [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:38 am
Edwards. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:00 am
United States v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
In addition, the authority of local and state regulatory agencies will be usurped by the U.S. [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:06 am
The federal judge to whom the case was assigned began his analysis of this issue by noting that a “challenge to a statute on First Amendment grounds requires that I first consider whether the speech . . . is protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]
