Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 10,389
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2020, 10:22 am
In Ozgur v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 10:22 am
In Ozgur v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 10:22 am
In Ozgur v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:15 am
This sentiment was expressed in our decision in Shepp v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 3:10 am
This article investigates the quirks of the Lanham Act’s Section 2(a), which provides a right-of-publicity-style ground of refusal of registration to celebrities, universities with nicknames, and international companies seeking protection of their well-known marks in the United States (where those companies are not using such marks)—and without a showing of trademark rights, use in commerce, or likelihood of confusion. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
It was not until 1961, in Monroe v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 11:02 am
Trade Marks GuestKat Nedim Malovic commented on the CJEU judgment in Ferrari SpA v DU, C–720/18 and C–721/18 concerning the scope of ‘genuine use’ in trade mark law. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 8:43 am
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared an episode of the National Security Law Podcast about the latest developments in the TikTok lawsuit and the Justice Department and the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 5:38 am
(v) Capabilities have been established to train cyber operations personnel, test cyber capabilities, and rehearse cyber missions. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 1:00 pm
United States, 523 U. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 10:30 am
” They talked about the latest developments in the TikTok lawsuit, the Justice Department and the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 3:04 am
Wend Wendland, adjunct professor at University of Cape Town's IP Unit shares initial thoughts on the Draft IP Protocol here. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:48 am
It has continuously and substantially exclusively used the CITY OF LONDON mark in the United States since 2012, with sales from October 2012 through November 22, 2019 (date of the declaration) exceeding $1.5 million dollars. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 12:24 am
[28] Secondly, it must be stated that Nigerian courts are able to decline jurisdiction, when called upon to hear a case, if upon considering all relevant factors, they form the view that another forum exists with jurisdiction and is the more appropriate forum.[29] However, when a judgment is brought for recognition in Nigeria, Nigerian court [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 9:07 am
The October 2 order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit with instructions to remand to the District Court for further consideration in light of Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Bookstores, g., United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 3:46 am
Corp. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 28060-20 Sturt v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 27845-20 Garrity v The Scotsman, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 27809-20 Levick v The National, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 15320-20 Cook v Daily Express, 1 Accuracy (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation 12005-20 Oliver… [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:41 am
Wilson, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
But that claim raises an interesting question: Are the United States’s sister democracies doing any better than the United States in countering disinformation? [read post]
