Search for: "United States v. Peoples"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 22,855
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2023, 11:59 am
United States Surgical Corp., 135 F.3d 1456, 1460 (Fed. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 10:52 am
A creative legislative drafter using the techniques that Congress used to reenact most of the coverage of the Gun-Free School Zones Act after United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 7:38 am
Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal in the United States, UDV USA, https://udvusa.org/ [https://perma.cc/8GS5-PW2W] (last visited Feb. 14, 2023). [6]. 573 U.S. 682 (2014). [7]. 574 U.S. 352 (2015). [8]. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
In Troxel v. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
[On Tuesday, April 4, Georgetown Law devoted a session of its faculty workshop to honoring the publication of The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930-1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2022), a volume in the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Mark V. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 1:18 pm
EU has been first mover on some things and not others (Art. 17 v notice and takedown). [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:27 am
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
New Zealand, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States had already banned the app. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 12:57 pm
Brandon Beck, Judge Higginson and the Role of the Solicitor General in United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 6:05 am
Letelier v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 10:17 pm
That standard was most recent reaffirmed by the United States Supreme Court in MedImmune v Genentech, which stated: [Our cases] do not draw the brightest of lines between those declaratory-judgment actions that satisfy the case-or-controversy requirement and those that do not. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
Rostami v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:49 pm
It alleges serious misconduct: plotting to pay hush money to multiple people to avoid electoral consequences and falsifying documents to cover it up. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:19 pm
A summary of the facts The case of Macatė v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 12:46 am
Later, a version of interposition termed “Judicial Federalism” emerged as a constraint on federal legislative power in Printz v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 1:34 pm
She was happy to say: "I, Brianna Bolden-Hardge, vow to uphold the Constitutions of the United States and of the State of California while working in my role as an employee of the State Controller’s Office. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am
United States, 140 S. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am
On 29 March 2023, judgment was handed down by Saini J in the3million & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWHC 713 (Admin). [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:13 am
These stated “all properties procured under the policy will be as close to the borough as is reasonably practicable, given the financial constraints within which the service operates and the practical difficulties which can prevent units being procured in the borough or nearby locations” This had not been followed, given the numbers of people in 2020/21 being sent to Stoke on Trent. [read post]
