Search for: "Walker v. State"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 2,572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2012, 6:57 pm
Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding); Walker v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:40 am
Trying to read the tea leaves, I am thinking the Supreme Court may liken this speech (e.g., trademark registration) at issue to the speech of Texas license plates at issue in the case (Walker v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:16 am
Brown) and Windsor v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:38 am
In Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 7:00 am
The Court of Appeals reasons:Hunt emphatically stated his own violent intent. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 6:07 pm
The case is Ligon/Floyd v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
There again, the peculiarly interesting state of trade mark law in the United Kingdom and, not far beyond it, in the territory of the European Economic Area, might be closer to the cause. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 7:08 am
"The case is Porter v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 7:13 am
As this case was dismissed under Rule 12 for failure to state a claim, the facts are straightforward. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 8:12 am
The Court of Appeals (Walker, Cabranes and Parker) reinstates the claim. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:25 am
The Court of Appeals provides guidance on how Iqbal applies to overtime claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act.The case is Lundy v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 6:02 pm
The rounds continued to challenge participants as the night progressed, especially during the Supreme Court Audio Round, where everyone listened intently to Justice Ginsburg's timeless words, "make pot legal" and "bong hits for Jesus" while trying to name the court case they had been uttered during (Walker v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 8:14 am
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:53 am
The plaintiff still loses.The case is Leroy v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 6:12 am
The case was dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 10:41 am
The Second Circuit says they do not have a case.The case is BC v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 9:14 am
In Garcetti v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 10:15 am
” Flast v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 1:00 am
Miller & Ors v Ministory of Justice; O’Brien v Ministry of Justice; and Walker v Innospec Ltd & Ors, heard 8-9 Mar 2017. [read post]
