Search for: "Waters v. United States"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 4,952
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2023, 2:18 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
New Zealand, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States had already banned the app. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 4:36 am
Good news if you have stock in the United States - boy can that country buy low. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 9:14 am
United States (the “honest services” case) “has led to a string of dropped charges and new trials. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 7:04 am
The problem of where residual authority resided was not solved until the Supreme Court in Marbury v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 8:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 7:56 am
United States, 424 US 800 (1976) and Wilton v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 3:53 am
(f/n/a SFC), Defendants. 96 Civ. 3135 (JCF) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 2008 U.S. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
While recent years have seen a loosening of the standing requirements for states (see, e.g., Massachusetts v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 8:54 am
v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 6:13 am
The complaint in this case, Hohan v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:15 am
United States, 290 U.S. 13 (1933). [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 12:35 pm
July 23, 2018) (putative class action removed from state court to federal court alleging defendants, which meter and measure water and sewer utility for individual units in multi-unit complexes, overcharged plaintiffs for their use of water and sewer utilities in violation of the Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act and other state law) Pryor, et al. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 2:17 pm
Indeed, the First Amendment precludes a domestic government from exercising comparable control over a social media company in the United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 6:01 am
United States; United States v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:57 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 5:09 am
Tuesday’s decision in Armstrong v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:33 am
Over the years, Chevron‘s scope has been shaped through cases like United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:03 pm
In a significant and surprising development, on August 24 the Solicitor General of the United States filed a brief in the Supreme Court asserting that a groundbreaking climate change decision by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals should be vacated and remanded for further consideration. [read post]
