Search for: "Word v. U. S"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 2,468
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2011, 1:55 pm
(See for example Feldman v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 11:07 am
S. 601, 306 U. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 5:34 am
He does not purport to be an expert, and it would be unfair to put words in his mouth. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 1:50 pm
Bustamonte, 412 U. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Showell v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
Part II: Summary and Criticisms of the Advisory Panel’s Recommendations 1. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:42 am
So it is in Hadda v Lissner & Lissner LLP ; 2011 NY Slip Op 32519(U) September 19, 2011; Sup Ct, NY County; Docket Number: 109329/10; Judge: Emily Jane Goodman. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:05 pm
’ . . .Rayment texted Armstrong stating, `If u do what i say then i will do what u say. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 9:09 am
The text was in Latin, of course, and so only 23 letters were required (Latin does not use J , V or W; however V is now used to represent the consonantal U, and sometimes J to represent consonantal I).The phrase was rather nonsensical Latin. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:33 am
Posner (Photo: U. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 6:57 pm
Toronto)[127 downloads] Worth a Thousand Words: The Images of Copyright Law, by Rebecca Tushnet (GULC) [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:19 am
” In the New York Times, Steven Greenhouse reports that labor unions have reacted to the Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
The power struggle in Boz Export & Import, Inc. d/b/a Masal Café v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:52 pm
S. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 2:57 am
" Towers v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 11:26 am
The Jurisprudence of DignityLeslie Meltzer Henry University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 160, 2011 U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-42 AbstractFew words play a more central role in modern constitutional law without appearing in the Constitution than dignity. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:42 pm
Those involving recent U. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:42 pm
Those involving recent U. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
Kansas, 272 U. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 4:18 pm
The court nonetheless stressed that use of a mark in a domain name as such may be sufficient for constituting genuine use - just not in this case because the public would consider the use of the word Zappa as a general descriptive reference and would not understand it as a reference to the trade mark owner.For an in-depth analysis of this case, this Kat recommends Guido Westkamp’s current intelligence note published in JIPLP: “Personality trade marks and their limits:… [read post]
